The Orderly Brain
Interaction in the context of therapeutic improvement is based on the understanding of the points to be solved in the perspective that should be obtained.
Brief therapy entails the patient’s greater understanding of the problem to be solved. Classic therapy involves and implies a series of situations that patient and therapist have to understand and solve; see reality.
The developments in the context of improvement concern a few points
-ways to arrive at the implementation of decision making
- the so-called brain programming evolution of neurolinguistic programming
The various “mental levels” are conditioned by correct thoughts; see types of rewards chosen after a series of obvious considerations; see therapeutic solutions.
If therapy is not carried out (see best choices) there would be somatizations to be resolved; see ideas carried out.
Deterrences can usually be placed at the cortical level.
They obviously derive from a processing path carried out by the person under induced self- or hetero-hypnosis.
Metaphor is always a valid tool for not explicitly revealing problems that the patient might not have understood or has not processed completely or not in an entirely personal way.
After analysing the case with the therapist and through self-reprocessing, we reach a solution that the patient is able to carry out; see surrounding conditions.
At that point deterrence becomes a work tool for therapist and patient.
Brief therapy is a consequence of this.
The decision making process is carried out (see dopaminergic pathways going from mesencephalic reward pathway to cortex).
In the simplest cases, it is an automatically carried out system, in others it entails rapid processing, in still others it involves interaction with the therapist, which for the most part achieves the final solution.
This system typically involves the processing of a plan parallel to the therapeutic plan in which the somatising patient strengthens him/herself towards a balance that resolves or improves the pathological picture.
It turns into internal medicine or metabolic therapy when the patient becomes aware of the pathology and of the problem to be solved.
Thus diabetics and those with metabolic disorders must understand how to improve their condition.
E-health medicine, whether we are talking about self-management of the therapeutic diagnostic picture or self-regulated information of the pathology towards healing, seems more and more to be the solution for pathological cases.
Thus empowerment involves stabilisation of the pathological case towards a condition of balance in the situational complex.
FROM NLP TO BRAIN PROGRAMMING
A therapeutic development consists of the reduction in verbal reaction at the moments when the patient tries to process his/her condition. This means that the therapist solves cases that are either similar to each other or correlated in the resolution method.
The patient’s prayers could be seen as expressive mode in cases in which religiosity is strongly experienced.
It is true, however, that the patient who expresses him/herself often on his/her own problems appears to have processed the situations that he/she experiences in a mature way.
At the same time, the therapist can compare cases without obviously correlating them to avoid taking for granted that a deterrence is always valid in each case.
Brain programming should not be interpreted as a form of exorcism, which is always negative, rather it should be interpreted as a quick and effective solution for synchronously carrying out deterrences.
Negating forms of ironic telepathy between doctor and patient, we arrive in any case at the understanding of the case; see mental order that doctor and patient must have.
The patient processes problems in a personal way. And the therapist, having experienced a process of elaboration of his/her own conditions, knows how to solve, in reality, the problems and resolved crucial issues of the patient or of the person who turns to him/her to carry out what he/she knows and how.
Conscious dissociations are, on the other hand, those for which, in cases of simply solved problems, there will always be gaps remaining between solved problem and way in which the solution was carried out.
Possible dissociations should be reassociated; see possible therapist therapist comparisons and comparisons with the literature pertaining to cases.
Physical activity as therapy/non-therapy remains the best key for protecting physical metabolic balance, and it should be placed alongside verbal forms of improvement of the person.
No therapy is ever finished even though all deterrences and forms of empowerment are always the resolution key to be carried out in the best way possible.
- Reward pathway and decision making, Academic press by Jean Claud Dreher.
- Empowerment conference proceedings (Denmark 2012)
- Riccardo Arone di Bertolino – L’ipnosi per un medico, La Martina
- Dora Dragoni – Reward pathway & motricidade, Neuroscienze